Questões de Concurso
Filtrar
5.460 Questões de concurso encontradas
Página 35 de 1.092
Questões por página:
Questões por página:
Consider the following situation based on the text.
A maritime safety officer is briefing the crew before the first regular operation of a fully electric vessel. The officer wants to emphasize the need to monitor the ship's energy use during the voyage.
Which sentence is appropriate in this context?
Disciplina:
Inglês
Consider the word unlockable in the following contexts:
I. The emergency latch is unlockable from the inside with a single movement.
II. After the mechanism broke, the cabinet became unlockable: the door could no longer be secured.
The difference in meaning can be represented through alternative hierarchical structures of the same sequence of morphemes.
Which analysis corresponds to the two contexts?
I. The emergency latch is unlockable from the inside with a single movement.
II. After the mechanism broke, the cabinet became unlockable: the door could no longer be secured.
The difference in meaning can be represented through alternative hierarchical structures of the same sequence of morphemes.
Which analysis corresponds to the two contexts?
Disciplina:
Inglês
Consider the clause opening the diagnostic discussion:
While still in use, the term Asperger's Syndrome does not appear in the most recent version...
Which grammatical analysis accounts for the structure and discourse relation of "While still in use"?
While still in use, the term Asperger's Syndrome does not appear in the most recent version...
Which grammatical analysis accounts for the structure and discourse relation of "While still in use"?
Disciplina:
Inglês
Regarding the syntactic behavior of prepositions and
conjunctions in English, mark T for true and F for false.
(__)In Despite the fact that the evidence was incomplete, the committee proceeded, despite functions as a preposition whose complement is the noun phrase headed by fact , while the that-clause is embedded within that noun phrase.
(__)In Because the evidence was incomplete and because of the evidence was incomplete , because and because of are syntactically interchangeable causal connectors, since both can directly introduce finite clauses.
(__)In Whereas the first proposal emphasizes access, the second emphasizes efficiency, whereas functions as a preposition because it establishes a contrastive relation between two propositions.
(__)The expressions in case and in case of belong to the same syntactic category: both directly introduce finite subordinate clauses expressing precaution or contingency.
The correct sequence, from top to bottom, is:
(__)In Despite the fact that the evidence was incomplete, the committee proceeded, despite functions as a preposition whose complement is the noun phrase headed by fact , while the that-clause is embedded within that noun phrase.
(__)In Because the evidence was incomplete and because of the evidence was incomplete , because and because of are syntactically interchangeable causal connectors, since both can directly introduce finite clauses.
(__)In Whereas the first proposal emphasizes access, the second emphasizes efficiency, whereas functions as a preposition because it establishes a contrastive relation between two propositions.
(__)The expressions in case and in case of belong to the same syntactic category: both directly introduce finite subordinate clauses expressing precaution or contingency.
The correct sequence, from top to bottom, is:
Disciplina:
Inglês
Regarding restrictive and negative-like fronting in formal
English, mark T for true and F for false.
(__)In Only when did the participants receive the instructions they recognize the ambiguity, the inversion is correctly located because fronting only when requires subject?auxiliary inversion inside the dependent clause.
(__)In Not until the results were independently replicated did the committee revise its position, the fronted constituent licenses inversion because it has restrictive scope over the temporal relation expressed by the sentence.
(__)In Only after the second calibration had been completed did the technicians obtain stable readings, subject?auxiliary inversion occurs in the main clause rather than inside the subordinate clause introduced by after.
(__)A sentence beginning with Rarely may display subject?auxiliary inversion when the adverbial is fronted, as in Rarely have researchers encountered such consistent results.
The correct sequence, from top to bottom, is:
(__)In Only when did the participants receive the instructions they recognize the ambiguity, the inversion is correctly located because fronting only when requires subject?auxiliary inversion inside the dependent clause.
(__)In Not until the results were independently replicated did the committee revise its position, the fronted constituent licenses inversion because it has restrictive scope over the temporal relation expressed by the sentence.
(__)In Only after the second calibration had been completed did the technicians obtain stable readings, subject?auxiliary inversion occurs in the main clause rather than inside the subordinate clause introduced by after.
(__)A sentence beginning with Rarely may display subject?auxiliary inversion when the adverbial is fronted, as in Rarely have researchers encountered such consistent results.
The correct sequence, from top to bottom, is:
